Google Translate Icon

IPC 217 - Public servant disobeying a direction of law with intent to save person from punishment, or property from forfeiture

Description of IPC 217

Description of IPC Section 217 According to section 217 of Indian penal code, Whoever, being a public servant, knowingly disobeys any direction of the law as to the way in which he is to conduct himself as such public servant, intending thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or subject him to a less punishment than that to which he is liable, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or any charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. IPC 217
Offence Public servant disobeying a direction of law with intent to save person from punishment, or property from forfeiture
Punishment 2 Years or Fine or Both
Cognizance Cognizable
Bail Bailable
Triable Magistrate Court
Who is Liable: A public servant who knowingly disobeys legal directions with the intent to save someone from legal punishment, reduce their punishment, or protect property from forfeiture. Act Prohibited: Disobeying legal duties as a public servant to benefit someone or to save property.
Up to 2 years imprisonment, a fine, or both.

IPC 217 in Simple Words

In simple words, Section 217 of the Indian Penal Code states that if a public servant knowingly disobeys the law to save someone from legal punishment or subject them to a lesser punishment, or to save property from forfeiture, they can be punished with imprisonment up to two years, or fined, or both.

Importance and Practical application

IPC Section 217 underscores the vital role of accountability for public servants. By criminalizing the willful disobedience of legal duties aimed at protecting individuals or property, it reinforces the expectation that officials must act in accordance with the law. This helps preserve the integrity of the justice system and ensures that no one is above the law.

Practical application:

Examples: A police officer deliberately ignores evidence to protect a person from being prosecuted. Legal Consequences: Ensures public servants adhere to legal procedures and do not misuse their authority.

Conclusion

The provisions of IPC Section 217 serve as a deterrent against misconduct among public officials. By imposing penalties for those who knowingly disobey legal obligations, the law promotes transparency and fairness within public service. Upholding these standards is essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring that justice is served impartially.