IPC 218 - Public servant framing an incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment, or property from forfeiture
Description of IPC 218
Description of IPC Section 218
According to section 218 of Indian penal code, Whoever, being a public servant, and being as such public servant, charged with the preparation of any record or other writing, frames that record or writing in a manner which he knows to be incorrect, with intent to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, loss or injury to the public or to any person, or with intent thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or other charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
IPC 218
| Offence | Public servant framing an incorrect record or writing with intent to save person from punishment, or property from forfeiture |
| Punishment | 3 Years or Fine or Both |
| Cognizance | Cognizable |
| Bail | Bailable |
| Triable | Magistrate Court |
Up to 3 years imprisonment, a fine, or both.
IPC 218 in Simple Words
In simple words, Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code states that if a public servant, responsible for preparing records or writings, deliberately frames them incorrectly to cause loss, injury, or save someone from legal punishment or property from forfeiture, they can be punished with imprisonment up to three years, or fined, or both.
Importance and Practical application
IPC Section 218 plays a crucial role in safeguarding the accuracy and integrity of public records. By penalizing public servants who deliberately falsify or frame incorrect records, it ensures transparency and prevents the misuse of official documents. This is vital in maintaining trust in public institutions and deterring corruption within the system.
Practical application:
Examples: An officer falsifies records to cover up a crime or financial misappropriation. Legal Consequences: Prevents corruption and maintains the integrity of official records.Conclusion
The enforcement of IPC Section 218 protects the fairness and reliability of legal proceedings and public administration. By imposing strict penalties on those who distort records for personal or financial gain, the law reinforces the duty of public servants to uphold justice and accountability. This provision is essential to prevent the manipulation of official records and ensure justice is not compromised.